[SOLVED] External Authoritative Sources

External Authoritative Sources
3. Each student shall:
3.1 Each student shall find, read and review two (2) “External Authoritative Sources” (defined below), discussing any topic found in Chapter 14 Ethics.
3.2 Provide a separate paragraph narrative for each of the two (2) required “External Authoritative Sources”
3.2.1 Each source shall be substantively used and properly cited in a narrative paragraph using APA style for the citation(s) only
3.2.2 Following each narrative paragraph full and complete reference(s) for the source(s) cited in the narrative is required using APA style for the reference(s) only
3.2.3 A link to the full article for each of the two (2) required external authoritative sources is required immediately following each reference
3.3 Points will be lost if the reference(s) for the first source does not follow the brief paragraph narrative substantively citing the first source along with the link. Then the second source narrative shall be presented also with proper citation(s), reference and link.
4. Each assignment shall be submitted by each student on or before the designated due date shown on the course schedule and Canvas.
5. “External Authoritative Sources” for purposes of this course shall mean: articles from published books, peer reviewed journal articles, education and government sites as well as non-partisan national or international organizations (such as WHO, UNICEF, UNAIDS etc.,) provided, however the article selected must have:
5.1 Authors; and
5.2 In text citations and references to support statements made therein.
5.3 Under no circumstances are newspapers (e.g., the Wall Street Journal), blogs (regardless of source), editorials, and panel discussions, definition of terms, “dot com” sites, and text books from the course or other courses to be used. The foregoing are not considered authoritative for this course.
6. Late submissions are not accepted.
7. Grading Rubric for the 10 maximum points
Criteria Point Value
Each assignment was submitted and reviewed by FIU Writing Center as well as posted in the proper discussion board submission folder 1 or 0
Two narrative paragraphs using proper English 2
Two “external authoritative sources” each one substantively and properly cited in each narrative paragraph using APA Style 2 or 3
Two complete and proper APA Style references to ”external authoritative sources.” Each reference to immediately follow each narrative paragraph 2
Two complete links to each of the “external authoritative sources” leading to the full article. The link placed at the end of each reference.
SAMPLE
As requested, below please find a sample of one of the two sources required for the Individual Authoritative Links Assignment. Students may not use this source in their submission or it will receive zero points.
TITLE: The Changed Environment: Pharmaceutical Companies, Medical Providers, and Gifts.
NARRATIVE #1: In ‘’Limiting the Influence of Pharmaceutical Industry Gifts on Physicians: Self-Regulation or Government Intervention?’’ (Grande, 2010), examines the public’s increasing interest in the influence pharmaceutical companies have on physicians through gifts and the efforts for regulation. Grande (2010), sheds light on the influence pharmaceutical gifts have on medical providers and how this scrutiny is questioning the objectivity and independence of physicians and the way they prescribe medication (para. 2). The pharmaceutical gifts that are potentially swaying physicians’ objectivity range from company-sponsored meals, drug samples, to other none “educational” gifts of less value (Grande, 2010, para. 5). Although some gifts might appear trivial, data suggests that even gifts that might not have much significance may create influence (Grande, 2010, para. 12). The public’s interest in the effect these gifts have on physicians was piqued from the realization that drugs that were heavily marketed were revealed to pose public health risks, the rising costs of pharmaceuticals was also a major factor (Grande, 2010, para. 2). Grande explains that efforts toward self-regulation have been made such as the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) issuing voluntary guidelines in 2002(Grande, 2010, para. 5). However, circumstances advise that depending on ethics guidelines to guide self-regulation have been slow to bring substantive change (Grande, 2010, para. 8). As for governmental intervention, Grande (2010), explains that governmental regulations will contain loopholes and the pharmaceutical industry will find ways to promote its products regardless of ethics (para. 26).
Reference:
Grande, D. (2009). Limiting the Influence of Pharmaceutical Industry Gifts on Physicians: Self-Regulation or Government Intervention? Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25(1), 79–83.
Link:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1016-7 (link) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2811591/
Then proceed to the second source. Repeat the narrative, citations, reference and link to the full article.