Summary: The EZ Company had produced a new information integration and visu= alization technology, and they had begun negotiation for a sale of their co= mpany to a savvy suitor. The product had been sold to many domain knowledge= experts in several multi-billion dollar companies worldwide and to several= US government agencies, all of whom had carefully inspected the technology= and considered their returns on investment.
The Problem: However, the prospective suitor told the board of directors of= EZ that the valuation of the company had been diminished as the result of = “attacks” by a single blogger using many self-promoting web pag= es and on trash talk blogs in which the attacker proclaimed himself: “= an expert in information visualization.”
It is important to note for this case that the blogger had completed no for= mal education in the field (in fact only had degree in religious studies an= d communications), nor had he published any original reviewed scholarly res= earch; yet in an apparent grudge that began years earlier in a dispute with= some of the company principals, the blogger dogmatically attacked EZ along= with people associated with EZ, their customers, and even against research= ers who he claimed were vested in EZ because they had published favorable o= riginal studies on the information visualization method and technology. In = one high-traffic blog, the attacker wrote the following false information:<= /p>
The paper published by a professor named Dr. Sobar showing improved underst= anding of the data using the EZ product is because Dr. Sobar is employed by= EZ and is biased so that she can line her own pockets. I have tested EZ my= self, and it does NOT work. EZ continues to pay lots of money to Sobar, the= Gartner Group and other industry promoters so that they place high in thei= r quadrants, but my own assessment shows their product to be a sham, and pr= ofessors such as Dr. Sobar are liars for their own gain.
-Alon= g with posts to many social media outlets with 1 star (and Thumbs Down) rat= ings…
Situation and What to do?
To try to appease the attacker, one of the company’s public relations= representatives sent an email to the blogger thanking him for trying to he= lp the company improve its products, and asked for feedback directly, and o= ffered to pay the blogger to “consult” with them to find ways t= o improve the product.
However, rather than taking this offer as a complement, the attacker was em= boldened. Theb the blogger took out of context bits of personal email messa= ge sent to him in attempt to be conciliatory, and to clarify, and the he ma= nipulated them and distributed the fabrication in a “newsletter&rdquo= ; and posted it online with his stated intention to prevent the company fro= m selling its product.
The company executives then hired several independent researchers to conduc= t studies and also solicited testimonials from several Fortune 10 companies= that had purchased the product, and they used these materials in a campaig= n to help improve the image of the product and try to neutralize the blogge= r’s attempts to interfere with the company’s business. However,= the relentless onslaught from social media by the attacker served to doom = EZ from reaching its potential.
What to do? You have been called upon by the corporate executives to develo= p a strategy to deal with the problem and to help prevent it from happening= again in the future. You will also recommend courses of action and policie= s to deal with these kinds of problems. Consequently, you shall assume the = role of “expert” and provide professional advice.
1. Drawing upon what you have read in your textbook about managing security= behaviors, the additional readings and materials you have been given, and = doing additional secondary research about the subject (which be sure to cit= e fully using APA format), develop an overall assessment of what you think = are this attacker’s motives. (Note: a useful analog resource might be= to look up on the Web about the Honeynet Project – Why People Attack= Computer Systems).
2. Ba= sed on these motivational assumptions, develop an analysis of the problem (= who, what, where, and why –fully justified).
3. Fr= om the previous premises, develop a strategy and a sophisticated solution o= r set of recommendations, written professionally (something you might provi= de to this client, your boss,
Are you overwhelmed by an intense schedule and facing difficulties completing this assignment? We at GrandHomework know how to assist students in the most effective and cheap way possible. To be sure of this, place an order and enjoy the best grades that you deserve!Post Homework